<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lohan Groupie &#187; chapter 27</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lohangroupie.com/tag/chapter-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lohangroupie.com</link>
	<description>Lohan Groupie - News, rumors, photos and juice on Lindsay Lohan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Are you tired of Lindsay Lohan?</title>
		<link>http://www.lohangroupie.com/are-you-tired-of-lindsay-lohan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lohangroupie.com/are-you-tired-of-lindsay-lohan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arieanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dina Lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gossip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chapter 27]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paparazzi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lohangroupie.com/are-you-tired-of-lindsay-lohan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a research poll conducted by E-Poll Market Research, which provides &#8220;appeal&#8221; rankings of 4,500 celebrities, Lindsay Lohan may be &#8220;overexposed.&#8221; In fact, Dina Lohan is ranked as overexposed as well.
The research firm takes stock of which celebrities are grating on the public &#8211; celebrities termed &#8220;overexposed&#8221; are often too much in the public eye, which can breed contempt. The average &#8220;appeal&#8221; ranking for the term &#8220;overexposed&#8221; for celebrities at the peak of their careers is from 3-7% of those polled (of the 46 &#8220;appeal&#8221; terms available). For some perspective, 65% of the US population polled found that both [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.lohangroupie.com">Lohan Groupie</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lohangroupie.com/chapter-27-updates/"><img height="307" border="0" width="204" style="margin: 5px; float: right" alt="" src="http://www.lohangroupie.com/files/2008/03/ll-smiling.jpg" /></a>According to a research poll <a href="http://www.forbes.com/media/2008/11/13/lohan-hilton-simpson-biz-media-cx_lr_1113overexposed.html">conducted</a> by <a href="http://www.epollresearch.com/corp/home.view;jsessionid=C840B0CAA9BD139E60210B70F631C9A5.tomcat2">E-Poll Market Research,</a> which provides &#8220;appeal&#8221; rankings of 4,500 celebrities, <strong>Lindsay Lohan may be &#8220;overexposed.&#8221; </strong>In fact, Dina Lohan is ranked as overexposed as well.</p>
<p>The research firm takes stock of which celebrities are grating on the public &#8211; celebrities termed &#8220;overexposed&#8221; are often <strong>too much in the public eye</strong>, which can breed contempt. The average &#8220;appeal&#8221; ranking for the term &#8220;overexposed&#8221; for celebrities at the peak of their careers is from 3-7% of those polled (of the 46 &#8220;appeal&#8221; terms available). For some perspective, 65% of the US population polled found that both Britney Spears &#038; Paris Hilton were overexposed. That&#8217;s quite a high figure!</p>
<h2>Hollywood&#8217;s Most Overexposed Celebrities for 2008</h2>
<ol>
<li>Paris Hilton (Overexposed Score: 65%)</li>
<li>Britney Spears (65%)</li>
<li><strong>Lindsay Lohan </strong>(56%)</li>
<li><strong>Dina Lohan</strong> (50%)</li>
<li>Pamela Anderson (49%)</li>
<li>OJ Simpson (47%)</li>
<li>Donald Trump (44%)</li>
<li>Miley Cyrus (44%)</li>
<li>Nicole Richie (44%)</li>
<li>Heidi Montag (44%)</li>
</ol>
<p>There are celebrities who live very quiet lives, outside the paparazzi and tabloids. It&#8217;s not easy to do, but it&#8217;s do-able. Particularly with younger celebrities, however, the<strong> paparazzi seem to be part of the recipe of early success.</strong> But they are hard to shake &#8211; and as much as they can sell success, they can also be a recipe for disaster (perhaps?). This is an interesting idea to discuss &#8211; <strong>what do you think?!</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re<strong> <em>not</em> tired of Lindsay </strong>(and I know you&#8217;re not!), then you can <strong>tune in to her movie <em><a href="http://www.lohangroupie.com/chapter-27-us-premiere-dates/">Chapter 27</a></em> when it airs tonight on tv</strong>!! Listing information can be<a href="http://movies.tvguide.com/chapter-27/tv-listings/293090"> found here.</a></p>
<p><em>Image © Peace Arch Entertainment</em></p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.lohangroupie.com">Lohan Groupie</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lohangroupie.com/are-you-tired-of-lindsay-lohan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
