Lohan Groupie - Lindsay Lohan News

36 opinions for Lindsay Lohan Stripper Stills

• Dem Apples
  Jul 9, 2007 at 7:27 pm

  Does she show those amazing hooters in this movie?

• Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often
  Jul 9, 2007 at 8:33 pm

  apple person…thats a rather sexist remark since her physical attributes are just a part of her,and there is so much more to her persona and incredible
  appeal.what are you,a neanderthal?here i thought we had come so far in giving women,especially insanely talented,charismatic women,their just due.
  grow up,apple boy,and try to look at the bigger picture.as Meryl Streep said,”that’s all”.nothing further for you,so let me touch on the above topic.Lindsay is rather erotic and enticing in these stills,and as such,the aubrey character appears to be a jekyl and hyde personality;a charming and bright college student by day,an alluring and erotic exhibitionist by night.opposites sides of the same personality,played to perfection by the incomparable
  Lindsay Lohan.i must say i am looking forward to seeing this movie on the big screen where her talent is truly larger than life.i wish Lindsay the best of luck at the box office and i will definitely show my support by seeing it more than once.i was thoroughly taken with her character in Georgia Rule,and saw that excellent movie four times at the cineplex.best of health and happiness,miss Lindsay,and i will see you on the silver screen.peace

• Lindsay's Friend
  Jul 9, 2007 at 10:48 pm

  ok — “Dem Apples” — and such like-minded (if I can beg the question of there being a “mind” of sorts involved in this equation!)

  !!! ATTENTION !!! NEWS FLASH !!! ATTENTION !!!

  eh-Hhmm! ATTENTION — all ye paparazzi, and all ye purveyors of slime and their voyeur clientele !!!
  (important — pay attention — you need to know this …)

  Lindsay — that is, Lindsay Lohan, — is a woman — i.e. a female of the mammalian human species. Mammalian females have developed breasts (a.k.a “boobs” for the vernacular for those with like minds) for the purpose of nurturing their infant offspring (a.k.a. children). If your mother was a mammalian female — human or otherwise (for the benefit of some of ye paparazzi), she more than likely had breasts — just like Lindsay does! Amazing — isn’t it! (btw — mammalian males also have breasts, but most of them are not sufficiently developed to sustain and nurture infant human offspring).

  OK — if we can continue — with apologies to Arieanna, and begging for her tolerance here — ok Arieanna? — please don’t remove, because this is something that apparently a lot of people don’t realize about Lindsay… ;-)

  OK — so mammalian female (and male, but again not as developed) breasts terminate at their peak in a nipple through which milk and other nutrients are secreted to nurture and sustain said infants. In most cultures — but not all — women’s breasts are regarded (and generally respected) as a personal part of their anatomy — at least by most civilized members of most civilized cultures — and are therefore typically covered by some sort of garment — at least when in public. In the event that an article of clothing might not fully cover all or part of one or both of a woman’s breast(s), both the breast(s), and possibly at times, the nipple,
  may be exposed to more public view than is generally rearded as the conventional norm within a given society.

  Such revelations of (all, or part of) a woman’s breast in those societies are received differently by various members of the society, depending on their “psycho/social bent” — i.e. whether they support and subscribe to the cultural dignity generally granted to women within the society, or whether they rather challenge that norm and welcome — nay — even SEEK — such opportunities for exposure (a.k.a. “boob slips” — again with reference to the vernacular, for those of like mind — again begging the ‘mind’ question) to gratify their attendant emotional and physiological responses to such exposure, and promote capturing images of such exposure to pass and trade and sell among themselves. This latter class of (ugh, do I have to say it ?) ” … citizens …” (ughh!) are typically held in considerably low esteem by those of the former class, and are otherwise deemed to be what is best termed as — well, I don’t I really want to use terms like that in here, do I?

  So — in conclusion, for those who were previously not aware, Lindsay Lohan is a woman, and as such has breasts. If you take a picture of Lindsay, you will more than likely observe them in those pictures — covered, to varying degrees, depending on her choice of garment, and its positioning relative to her breast(s) at the moment — and from the angle — that the picture was taken. In some instances, the (ugh, again) “… photographer” may have made a concerted effort to position him/herself such that more exposure of the breast(s) is observed than that observed by most normal people positioned in a typical relationship to Lindsay during the course of her day.

  I hope that has relieved some of the otherwise total insanity that seems to incessantly surround Lindsay regarding this topic. Thank you for your kind attention.

  Lindsay — you should, at this point, be “rolling on the floor laughing !!! — to think — they hadn’t noticed you had breasts? or that they HAD noticed? I’m not sure what their issue is — are you?

  Thanks, Arieanna — I hope that helps some of these paparazzi understand some things about their subject a little better, and how to take better pictures of Lindsay without having to be overly-concerned about whether or not, and in any case, how much of her breast(s) may or may not be showing from a given angle at any given moment.

  Now — guys — paparazzi guys, and dolls, and otherwise — PLEASE — give us a BREAK — and most of all — PLEASE GIVE LINDSAY A BREAK. Yes — she has breasts — ok - now we all know that and understand — so BACK OFF! sheezze!

  Thanks — from ALL of Lindsay’s friends.

  And Lindsay — thanks for all you put up with to bring your incredible talent and your personal best to so many of us!

  As always, your Affectionate Fan

• Daniel
  Jul 10, 2007 at 5:39 am

  she’s hot and her boobs are great.

• Lindsay's Friend
  Jul 10, 2007 at 8:50 am

  Daniel,

  I have a life — a wonderful life. My ‘complaint’ is with those who obviously do NOT — other than to harass Lindsay at point-blank range.

  Yes, agreed, correct, all of the above. Lindsay has a beautiful body, breasts, boobs included.

  NOW THAT WE HAVE ESTABLISHED THAT — SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSANDS OF TIMES OR MORE, thanks to the nosey, intrusive paparazzi — can we ALL — ESPECIALLY THE PAPARAZZI — just back off and enjoy the obvious from a little more respectful distance? It’s bad enough that her personal life gets hit on from way out with a bajillion-x lens. But these damn paparazzi are pushing her bodyguards around — within less than 2 feet of Lindsay — trying to get YET ANOTHER BOOB SHOT! Non-threatening personal space is typically slightly beyond arm’s reach — these a##-holes continually invade that space — bordering on the outright confrontational. Apparently (according to the article in Radar) it’s become a borderline gang war / feeding frenzy, with Lindsay as the sacrificial lamb — to be slaughtered by thousands of flashbulbs and shutters.

  In my humble opinion — ** VERY FEW ** such ” … people” (and I use that word with great reservation) should be allowed THAT close to Lindsay. I keep wondering if there can’t be some legal restraint on how close “the public” is allowed to approach someone “in public”. I only hope that her bodyguards run several layers deep — it’s a wonder something worse hasn’t happened. So anyway, I am hoping that if we let everyone know that Lindsay has boobs, and that it’s ok, because she’s supposed to have boobs, that maybe the idiocy will die down. That’s hoping for a lot, I realize, since idiocy seems to prevail no matter what.

  Sure she’s got great boobs — can we all move on now to the REST of who Lindsay is? — or at least BACK AWAY!!! Lindsay is now trying to “get a life” — HER LIFE — back — I say it’s (way past time) for the paparazzi to “get out of the picture” — in every sense of the word.

  How about we GIVE LINDSAY HER LIFE BACK?

  Lindsay — I know you WILL get your life back — and better. I am praying for the wisdom you need to find the best possible defense from this inhumane, demeaning, and damnable onslaught. So far, the best I have come up with is what you are already doing — JUST BE YOU! The BEAUTIFUL YOU that YOU REALLY ARE! If you do that, the “trash feeders” will lose interest (since they feed on trash — and you are NOT trash) and the only publicity left will be the TRUE YOU kind — THE BEST!!!

  As always, your (loving-how-beautiful-in-every-sense-of-the-word-you-are) Affectionate Fan

• Bill's Girl
  Jul 10, 2007 at 5:29 pm

  Damn those r some long comments! lol
  Let’s stay focused on Lindsay & her amazing gorgeous pics She looks stunning Can’t wait 4 the movie =)

• Hey LiLo!
  Jul 10, 2007 at 7:45 pm

  I noticed that there is a video on TMZ that shows a friend of Paris’ called “Greasy Bear” and he calls LiLo some bad names including “firecrotch”. Can someone please tell me what that means? I think that’s terribly rude of this Greasy Bear fellow.

• Elizabeth
  Jul 11, 2007 at 5:33 am

  To the people who are telling LL fans to get a life, GET A LIFE!
  The people who write long comments have opinions unlike your one-sentenced comments…

  You are not even *allowed* to judge (um, er, BASH) people through the LENGTH of their words..

  You *could* judge them through the length of their thoughts and opinions…

• Lindsay's Friend
  Jul 11, 2007 at 8:07 am

  Elizabeth — thank you for your support :-)

  I don’t usually “wax eloquent” (with some reservations on the “eloquent” part) in these posts — but I really am getting tired of seeing the continued close-up harassment of Lindsay for what appears to be only one purpose — getting a “boob shot”. SHE NEEDS A BREAK! And so I thought maybe if we could all just get over the “Lindsay has boobs” insanity maybe the sales would drop and the paps would go somewhere else in search of “boobs”. Actually — they need look no further than a mirror for that!. OK — I’ll stop here before I go on again.

  carrie, Dem Apples, et al — what is important is that we support Lindsay as a friend with the respect and courtesy she deserves as a human being — not as a “boob & body consumer”. I am blessed not to have gone through what Lindsay has gone through (although I have certainly had my own trials). I do not need to live my life through Lindsay’s. Rather — I would hope to offer Lindsay some support from my own experience as she is going through her difficulties. It is not necessary that Lindsay and I “be friends” — just that I be the kind of person with whom she COULD be friends — should she ever need such a friend — ok?

  Lindsay — all my love — in His Love,

  As usual, Your Affectionate Fan.

• Christine
  Jul 11, 2007 at 11:19 am

  lindsay looks so good i cannot wait for this movie! its sexy-scary

• Tres Chic
  Jul 11, 2007 at 11:23 am

  @Christine,

  YEP :)

• Dem Apples
  Jul 11, 2007 at 1:36 pm

  Lindsay’s Friend has us all wrong!

  I recognize Lindsay as being a beautiful “human being”! Does that mean I shouldn’t want to see those gorgeous hooters?

• Lindsay's Friend
  Jul 11, 2007 at 2:47 pm

  Dem Apples

  I’m not sure that I have you all that wrong — and I think we may not be thinking the same thing by “beautiful human being”. Without meaning to judge (in a purely negative sense), your wanting to ” … see those gorgeous hooters” seems to indicate that you would enjoy seeing pictures of those “gorgeous hooters” — and would therefore likely be a consumer of products (i.e. web posts, magazines, etc.) which contain those pictures. In being a consumer of such, you support (pay for — $) and promote the activities of the paparazzi who CONSTANTLY HARRASS LINDSAY — from less than two feet away — to take those pictures to sell to YOU!

  Other than her overall beauty, I’m not sure I understand what it is about her breasts that you so want to see — unless you are bringing to the scene a myriad of your own attendant thoughts and feelings (fantasy, lust, etc.) and using Lindsay’s breasts as a springboard for your inner thought life. Could I possibly have killed any lustful or romantic thoughts you may have any deader?

  If you want to “see those … hooters” AND REALLY support Lindsay, buy tickets — LOTS OF TICKETS — and watch the movie. Do NOT buy magazines or click on websites where intrusive paparazzi have posted their trash.

  The point is — GIVE LINDSAY A BREAK FROM THE PAPARAZZI SHOVING THEIR CAMERAS IN HER FACE AND DOWN HER DRESS FROM (LESS THAN) TWO FEET AWAY!!

• Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often
  Jul 11, 2007 at 3:29 pm

  apple person…my issue with you is your singular focus on her boobs.you say she is a beautiful human being and i agree wholeheartedly,but yet you never say anything about the rest of her that makes up this sensational woman.what gives?i will let you respond to this question instead of my usual rebuttal to inane comments like your original comment on the stills above.i find her to be outstandingly attractive and beautiful in every sense of the word,but there are facets of her persona that grab my attention beyond any mere surface beauty.i am entranced by the aliveness in her eyes and expressions,the throaty lilt of that sexy voice,and the uniqueness of her personality.all of these qualities combine for a mesmerizing presence on screen.i saw this firsthand when i she said hi,shook my hand,and signed a magazine for me,a hugely gratified and supportive fan.i do not judge her actions in her personal life,as i myself have faced similar issues,but it is how she responds to adversity that will add to her character and inner beauty,and i have no doubt that i will be an even bigger fan as she learns from her mistakes and moves into adulthood and maturity.i see an inner fire and resoluteness to her that will only add to her mystique and beauty as she matures and realizes her importance in keeping to the ideals of old hollywood and its lasting influence on cinema and popular culture.at the end of the day,Lindsay is truly an entertainer of the highest order and that will be her saving grace.so,yes,mr apple person,she is a beautiful person,but all beautiful people are flawed,and occasionally,those flaws actually add to their appeal,as in the case of the incomparable Lindsay Lohan.waiting for your input,mr apple….peace

• chrissy
  Jul 11, 2007 at 8:46 pm

  I appreciate Lindsay’s physical form as much as her character. But not all ‘fans’ do. Some find her physically unattractive yet spellbinding as an actress. Others, well, the more hormonally-charged, may only like her for her….assets.

  But this is good. This is diverse. Some only like her for….one thing. Well, she topped Maxims Hot #100. She plays a stripper in her new film. I think it’s safe to say she is becoming a sex symbol. If people want to revel in that, more power to her.

  When she lost all that weight in 2005, some people stopped calling her beautiful and started calling her all sorts of profound names. And yes, her chest dissapeared. But now that’s completely changed. I’m just glad that people are talking about how good she looks again. To me, any physical compliment for Lindsay nowadays reflects on the time and the effort she spent digging herself out of the bulimia trap she was in once. And she certainly hasn’t put an end to that time or effort. She looks great now, physical compliments are a must…no matter how sexually driven they are.

• Larry R
  Jul 12, 2007 at 1:03 am

  Now I will agree with that last Chrissy !! Compliments are a ” MUST “. But I will also qualify that, to say that REAL compliments are a must, and Supportive Compliments are a given!! And Backhanded psuedo-un-compliments, guised as well wishes are a NO No, such as ‘ Great R–K ‘ but in the same sentence we saw a comment that said ‘ No T—-T ‘ that to me is Blatent, and does not Qualify as a ” Compliment” as the clear intent of the complimenter is to DEGRADE, or DEFAME, NOT to ‘ Compliment ‘. And it wasn’t even all that subtle. and the post-er wasn’t fooling anyone. Irritation Factor. I think that Lindsay is Sexually very Lovely, In short Attractive on Many Subtle Levels, Like the Living Rainbow that she is; and I LOVE YOU Lindsay Lohan ! AND to the Other Detractors, “I” Have made MY decision, I have read a lot of DRIVEL out there these past few days, about Lindsay’s supposed “Sexual Orientation” , I am NOT Interested in that Folly, If Lindsay ‘is’ Bi- then SHE will have some Decisions to make very Shortly, I just pray that She makes the Right Ones. Personally I do not want to believe that she is, but I will wait for more FACTS, NOT ” Tabloid Speculation ” on same. Regardless of that Utter CRAP let me state this AGAIN, as if it needed to be, “I” Love YOU Lindsay Lohan!!! God Bless You Always. From ME, Larry T Robinson OR Tn.

• chrissy
  Jul 12, 2007 at 6:30 am

  Lol. Okie Dokie Larry, I agree with you. It is a GIVEN that she’s hot. And ‘real’ compliments build on that foundation. I have been reading up on a few trusty ol’ sources that made speculation over Lindsay’s sexual orientation too.

  And you know what? In today’s day and age…I don’t know why…..but it almost seems normal for a girl to be bisexual. I mean men still have a long way to go before acheiving that same mindset with their own gender……but I hear girls mature faster. Lol. Even I would be open to it!! And who knows…..if the rumours turned out to be true and Lindsay really was interested in girls…she might find someone who differed (mentally) to all the men she’s ever had….someone who was actually really decent and treated her right, who knows?

• elham
  Jul 12, 2007 at 7:34 am

  I agree with Lindsay’s friend but that is not only the
  vice of paparazzi. Unfortunately, it is Lindsay wants.

• Lindsay's Friend
  Jul 12, 2007 at 10:06 am

  elham,

  I’m starting to question that “Lindsay wants” line of thinking a little more closely. There may have been a time when Lindsay thought she “needed” any and everything that showed up as “publicity”. But “publicity” can be a 2-edged sword — “good” publicity — and “really, REALLY BAD” publicity.

  I think it would be GOOD if Lindsay had a CHOICE about the kind of publicity she gets — I don’t think that Lindsay either WANTS OR NEEDS everything she does to be public —

  In saying “Lindsay wants” — do YOU think that she wants EVERYTHING she does to be public? And if NOT — what choice does she have?

• chrissy
  Jul 12, 2007 at 9:31 pm

  Hey I am curious. Today I watched ET and they covered a little bit on I Know Who Killed Me. They said that in the movie, Aubrey’s alter ego was Dakota. Not an actual twin. ‘Dakota’ the stripper was only the subject of one of Aubreys college papers. Can someone explain to me? I’m so confused. Does Dakota actually exist, as Aubrey’s long-lost twin? Or is she just an essay?

• elham
  Jul 12, 2007 at 10:50 pm

  Lindsay’s Friend,
  You said: “I don’t think that Lindsay either WANTS OR NEEDS everything she does to be public”. If it’s true, why does she behave so (for showing & offering herself) and allow to behave her so?

• Lindsay's Friend
  Jul 13, 2007 at 4:52 pm

  elham — I think by “showing & offering herself” you may be referring to some of Lindsay’s actions in the recent past couple of years — which kind of went along with some of her other out-of-control behavior at the time. I know we keep seeing the kinds of pictures you describe — but that’s because people keep on digging up and re-posting old pictures.

  The point is — NOW — we are seeing a CHANGE IN LINDSAY — she’s not there any more — LINDSAY HAS MOVED ON!!! But the ” photographers” are still looking for the same old trash — they keep coming after her as though she is still the way she was back then. They’re looking for it — she doesn’t have it. Sorry to disappoint the trash fans — but Lindsay is NOT trash(ed) any more — NOT OUR LINDSAY! — never again! — so you’re going to have to look somewhere else.

  Right Lindsay? :-) You had better believe it!!!

  Lindsay — good night — God bless — rest well and be at peace with The PRINCE OF PEACE!

  As Always, your Affectionate Fan

• elham
  Jul 14, 2007 at 12:06 am

  OK! I’ll be glad very much if she changes her living way really to a pure life. Amen.

• A h M a D
  Jul 15, 2007 at 4:51 am

  thanks

• Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often
  Jul 15, 2007 at 10:48 pm

  hey,apple guy….still no response from you;what,can’t take some constructive criticism from some genuine fans of the charismatic and insanely-talented Lindsay Lohan??? oh well,you had your chance,poser,and now the statue of limitations has expired on your response.see ya.anyway,i wanted to add a little something to the mix.i am also a huge fan of Audrey Hepburn,of old hollywood fame,who was physically the complete opposite of miss Lindsay,in that she was painfully slender and somewhat flat-chested,but her personal style,startlingly beautiful eyes,and larger-than-life personality,more than made up for any ‘lack’ in physical assets.i am a big fan of Lindsays beauty and physical assets,but there is so much more to this modern-era bombshell than her boobs.she brings a presence to the silver screen that i have not felt since watching miss Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffanys,1961,one of my favorite all-time movies.i am still somewhat moved by some of Lindsays emotional scenes in Georgia Rule,and cannot wait to see this horror/thriller on july 27.Lindsay brings a depth of raw emotion and expression that is reminiscent of miss hepburn and the great female leads of a bygone era,and will get my cinematic vote and hard-earned dollar EVERY time,no matter the genre or role.the mark of a truly great actor or actress is that they get you to care about the character,good or evil,without reservation,and that you will identify with that character,something of your own life,flaws,accomplishments,etc. miss Lohan pulls me in with her different looks,sexy voice,charisma,charm,beauty yet girl-next-door appeal,emotion,huge expressive eyes,and that rarely-seen,five million watt smile,you know the one,people.that said,i can’t wait to see this movie!!!peace

• lola
  Jul 21, 2007 at 2:20 pm

  O.M.G
  she must be happy doing that movie :P

  love ya lindsay

• me
  Jul 24, 2007 at 1:40 pm

  linsday has fake breasts, why all the talk about her breasts? sure they look good as she paid enough for them, no-one with so little body fat on her has perfect C/D cup breasts.

• Some Guy
  Jul 24, 2007 at 9:25 pm

  I sense so much maturity on this debate. Yes we have the horny teenager looking to see some breasts, and then we have the woman who gives us a more thorough explanation to the function of breasts than some get at a college level anatomy class thinking that it will in some way encourage said horny guy to see women from a different perspective. I find it humorous that Lindsay’s Friend fails to realize all of the media’s control over us with its overwhelming amounts of sexuality everywhere that it creates this situation where men are always out to see a little more of a celebrity. To add to that I find it extremely hilarious that you have no signs of objection to Lindsay playing a stripper considering you try and make women out to be much more than a sexual object and the main person you are trying to defend is playing a character in which her body is an object of which to sell, we all know that strippers are just one rung up from a prostitute on society’s totem pole of respected professions.

  Finally if Lindsay is such an incredible actress as you portray her as, then I recommend she try and focus on her acting instead of having back-to-back DUI convictions and barely having time for the workers at the rehab clinic to clean out her room before she is right back in it.

  Condescend me all you want after this, but I was simply trying to bring a sort of reasoning behind this retarded debate over why it is so wrong to say “I wanna see her breasts” about some actress whom you idolize.

• MattMAtt
  Jul 25, 2007 at 8:00 pm

  Is it a bad time to say, “I want to see her breasts too?”

• lefty
  Jul 29, 2007 at 7:54 pm

  don’t forget about her nice ass.

• korey
  Aug 28, 2007 at 11:23 am

  I personally think lindsay is a gift. she has a nice smile and pretty eyes. These people really should just stop hatin for real.

• Aaron
  Oct 4, 2007 at 11:02 am

  Hey “Lindsay fan” why don’t YOU get a life and stop admiring something so fullheartedly that can’t even keep it’s life together no matter how much help is available to it. That thing is a black eye for humanity and should stop waisting all that undisearved money and give it to African relief efforts.

• Aaron
  Oct 4, 2007 at 11:03 am

  or something.

• David
  Jan 11, 2008 at 10:35 pm

  I agree with Lindsay’s Friend 100%, but I’d like to add something to his or her comments. Sorry, don’t know if you’re a guy or girl, Lindsay’s Friend. Anyway, I’d like to add that in addition to breasts being natural to supply milk for children and babies, another topic that this country can’t seem to be mature about is simple, non-sexual nudity…and I mean, from head to toe, too. Nudity is natural in its simplest form. But, somehow, the media treats it like trash and then, we wonder why there’s so much porn out there. Believe me, it’s everywhere these days. And, the media fuels the fire by making sex movies to degrade natural nudity for what it really is. So, Amen to you, Lindsay’s Friend.

• David
  Jan 11, 2008 at 10:41 pm

  This is also in regards to most comments people have made about another actress. Does the name Vanessa Hudgens ring a bell? Yeah, she’s the girl that took nude photos of herself and they got leaked online. But, look at the facts. She’s alone (in the photos), she’s naked, but what’s the big deal? I know this is way off-topic since this site is about Lindsay Lohan, but I mention Vanessa because no one seems to give her a break, either, just because of the photos. Vanessa did nothing wrong, either. She didn’t have to apologize. But, what burns me up is so-called “fans” who’ve looked up to her suddenly turn against her and say they hate her ever since this incident. I know you don’t like long comments, but sometimes, they’re necessary to explain things in greater detail. I like Lindsay’s Friend’s comments and the few that side with him or her. Those against Lindsay’s Friend…well, I can’t say it here or my comment may get deleted.

• David
  Jan 11, 2008 at 10:43 pm

  But, what burns me up the most*…

Have an opinion? Leave a comment:

• Use this area to discover new blogs and content in the b5media network.
• Beauty & Style
• Business
• Entertainment
• General
• Health & Wellness
• Lifestyles
• Music
• No Channel Selected
• Sports
• Team Blogs
• Technology
• Travel & Culture

• Social Web
• E-mail