Comments on: Lindsay Lohan Hits Starbucks

By: Lindsay's Friend

Lindsay's Friend — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:16:26 +0000

Lindsay — sorry to have to state the obvious — but then, we already knew that, right?

As Always, your Affectionate Fan

By: Lindsay's Friend

Lindsay's Friend — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:38:40 +0000

jaime,

you are (or perhaps better put, MIGHT HAVE BEEN) — unfortunately — PARTIALLY correct (” … she get attention from the paps because- she does parties and ends up in rehab a billion times, not b/c shes … “)

However — you seem to miss your own point!

That statement is only true to the extent that the slimy fecal-feeding paparazzi and their product consumers happen to feed on just that kind of fecal slime.

However — their bottom-feeding appetites are merely a reflection on who THEY are, and has ABSOLUTLELY NOTHING to do with talent or brilliance — believe me! NOTHING! They neither care about, nor even if they should happen to care, have NOT any faculty by which to make any sort of intelligible response to talent, brilliance, or beauty.

Believe me — there is absolutely NO CORRELATION to the activities of the paparazzi and ANYthing having to do with talent, brilliance, or beauty.

SO — I would hope you might soon abandon employing such a useless metric when assessing the reporting of the paparazzi on any activities having to do with Lindsay Lohan.

By: Larry R

Larry R — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:31:19 +0000

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
Jaime, I must take some small amount of time here to repeat that Lindsay keeps getting roles next to more FAMOUS Superstars, like Meryl Streep, and Jane Fonda, and the almost entire CAST of SNL, ( though I don’t personally watch snl ) B-E-C-A-U-S-E She Out Shines ALL ( count em ALL ) of her contemporaries, they Don’t have the Screen presence to make the show not lopsided and A one woman ( Lindsay ) SHOW!! They can’t carry the complex roles, with the exception of perhaps Anne Hathaway, If She were to star alongside Lindsay in a very complex movie with much plot complexity, like a Tomb Raider type thriller, She would be about the only one of Lindsay’s contemporaries that could keep Lindsay from stealing the entire production with her on screen presence, then it would Take someone like Julie Andrews, or Jaime Lee Curtis, to balence the two women. !! SO There !! Detractor You !! If Lindsay were so mediocre as you Imply ( there’s that implication thing again !!) Then WHY does Lindsay Keep getting roles against older established and well respected Stars in the entertainment industry ?? Just Look at ALL Her co-stars for all her movies, when She wasn’t paired up with a ” BIG NAME ” She stole the ENTIRE movie !! Like Just My Luck, Chris Pine, her leading man Co-Star, wasn’t a big enough screen presence to Balence Her, on the screen, The script was written so that a Star male co-lead would Balence her character, but his Screen Presence was just not up to Hers. The other three Girls, were just Foils for her, supporting acters for her character, The entire Show was all about HER, because the other major leads couldn’t generate enough pizzaz to get equal attention. Take the Movie Pirates of the Carribean for instance. Yhe Female Lead, is actually a poor third to and subordinate to the Male Leads of Jack Sparrow, and The Iron Smith, the Lad, who joins Jack on his adventures willingly or Unwillingly as the case may be, ( can’t remember the characters name right now, not one of MY favorite movies ) Played by Orlando Bloom, His stage Presence actually outshines Johnny Depps character, and we all are rooting for him !! BUT if you had put Lindsay in as the Female Lead, the third part of the Triangle, SHE would have been Orlando’s equal in stage presence !! would have been a truly Three-some like the Musketeer’s but with Kiera Knight in the role, not so strong. SO THERE !!
GOD Bless You Always Lindsay D Lohan, I Love You Always, ME, Larry T Robinson O.R. Tn.

By: jaime

jaime — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:01:26 +0000

she get attention from the paps because- she does parties and ends up in rehab a billion times, not b/c shes a brilliant actress or singer .

By: jaime

jaime — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:55:45 +0000

sorry to keep posting- but i do own those movies

By: jaime

jaime — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:45:27 +0000

larger than life icons on screen- YOUR WORDS NT MINE-right there she is not larger then life on screen, her reviews are usually not the best, some one larger than life icons on screen would be Marilyn monroe who is in a whole other universe compared to loan, oh yha i do watch old movies- more then i watch new ones, but your taking this whole Lindsey thing to another level

By: Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often

Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:25:56 +0000

i meant 1953 for ‘roman holiday’,sorry,and miss Hepburn won an oscar for her portrayal of the princess,in her first screen role,also one of my favorite movies.peace

By: Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often

Rachel Rule:dave must visit LG.com often — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:21:49 +0000

jaime…you can’t even spell her name correctly,so how could any ‘input’ you have,be taken seriously,and you certainly aren’t objective.what is the point of your negativity and non-fan remarks?and Lindsay is quite the throwback to the past,as most stars of that era were hellraisers offscreen,as well as larger than life icons onscreen.i believe YOU need to watch the old hollywood classics before you spit your venomous and quite negative rhetoric on this here fabuLLous fansite.may i recommend ‘roman holiday’ 1950,with Gregory Peck and Audrey Hepburn,and ‘kitten with a whip’ 1964,with the incredible Ann-Margret,and you will see the parallels with the immensely talented miss Lohan.wishing my favorite movie star,the absolutely beautiful and incomparable Lindsay Lohan,the best of health,happiness,and nimble feet and great tango moves on the set of ‘dare to love me’.miss Lohan,please disregard the haters and the trashloid media,go,go,go….peace.
P.S. private…thanks for your positive comment and it will cancel out the negative vibes of that jaime person.

By: AmerikanuLuvLindsay

AmerikanuLuvLindsay — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:49:34 +0000

Jaime…if you don’t have nothig good to say please don’t say at all…This supper Nr.1 talented actress Lindsay Lohan had so manny Blockbuster films and she just bounce’t back from a werry hard adiction and she is still nr.1…So please…If Lindsay Lohan is not a talented actress and you can’t compare her to the other celebs…Then i’m going to throw my computer out the window and shoot myself…Love our most talented, beautifull actress and singer it the world the unique Lindsay Lohan…P.S….if the other actresses are so good why don’t they get so manny atencion from the paparazzi?The paparazzi are all over Lindsay she is folowed every where…Peace

By: jaime

jaime — Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:25:21 +0000

she’s alright but nothing about her is classic, she’s not like old Hollywood at all, nothing about her says that or even gives that vibe, i mean she’s mediocre conpared to todays standings as fas as acting goes, and she deff does not act or carry herself in a classy way, so i don’t know what all that was about, but it seems you need to go watch some old films then watch Lindsey’s films, it isn’t really fair to all those great actresses, and film personalities , to compare Lindsey to them, your doing them a huge dishonorer, i don’t think they’d be pleased.